Internxt Drive
Ad · Internxt is a privacy-focused cloud storage platform with zero-knowledge encryption and anonymous accounts. The free plan offers 1GB of storage forever, with paid plans…
Private alternatives to Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, iCloud, vetted against our public criteria.
Grouped by threat level
Ad · Internxt is a privacy-focused cloud storage platform with zero-knowledge encryption and anonymous accounts. The free plan offers 1GB of storage forever, with paid plans…
Ad · Premium plans to get 500 GB ($3.19 USD/mo) or 2 TB ($7.99 USD/mo) storage space. 30-day money-back guarantee. Company is based in Lithuania.
Zero-knowledge notes, tasks, files, passwords and journal secured by a single 12-word recovery phrase, with no email or password required. The crypto core and database schema are published for audit. No subscription model.
Ad · 15 GB storage for 3.99€/mo or 500 GB for 9.99€/mo. Discount for yearly payments. Based in Switzerland.
Nextcloud is functionally similar to Dropbox, Office 365 or Google Drive. It can be hosted in the cloud or on-premises. It is scalable from home office solutions based on the…
No matches for those filters.
| Tool | Hosting | Based in | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cloud | Spain | Freemium |
| | Cloud | Lithuania | Paid |
| | Cloud | Switzerland | Freemium |
| | Cloud | New Zealand | Freemium |
| Cloud | Switzerland | Freemium |
| | Cloud | Switzerland | Paid |
| | Self-host | Germany | Free |
| | Cloud | Germany | Freemium |
| Cloud | Switzerland | Freemium |
| Cloud | United States | Freemium |
Mainstream cloud storage holds the keys to your files, which means the provider, and anyone who can compel it, can read what you store. Zero-knowledge services encrypt everything on your device first, so the company only ever sees scrambled data. These are the most secure cloud storage providers, the ones that cannot read your files even when they want to or are forced to.
There is no privacy switch inside a service that holds your decryption keys. Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, and iCloud encrypt your files in transit and on their disks, but the provider keeps the keys, so it can read or hand over your contents whenever it chooses or is ordered to. A setting cannot change that, because the architecture itself is built around the provider being able to open your files. The only real fix is storage where the key never leaves your device, which is what every pick on this page is built to do.
Two phrases describe the same idea: zero-knowledge and end-to-end encryption. Both mean your files are scrambled on your device, with a key only you hold, before they ever reach the cloud. The provider stores data it genuinely cannot read, so a breach or a legal demand turns up nothing useful. This is the line that separates a service that is merely “encrypted” while keeping the keys, from one that has deliberately locked itself out. When the company cannot open your files, neither can an attacker who breaches it or a court that subpoenas it.
Every service here is measured against our public listing criteria: genuine end-to-end (zero-knowledge) encryption rather than encryption the provider can undo, open-source clients where possible so the encryption can be inspected, a clear jurisdiction, and a business model that earns from storage rather than from your data. We weigh independent security audits and file versioning so ransomware and mistakes stay recoverable. Jurisdiction is one factor we consider rather than a single pass-or-fail test, because where a company is based shapes the legal pressure it can face. We only list storage we would trust with our own files.
Start with the encryption model, because everything else is secondary if the provider can read your files. Confirm it is genuinely zero-knowledge, ideally with open-source clients you can verify. Then check for file versioning, so a mistake or a ransomware hit stays recoverable, and a reliable sync client for every device you actually use. Keep the central trade-off in mind: if the provider cannot read your files, it also cannot recover them when you lose your key, so storing that key safely becomes your job. For files you cannot move yet, a local encryption layer (see below) brings the same protection to storage you already pay for.
For everyday use, yes. Sync and the mobile apps work the way you expect, with sharing links and the encryption itself running quietly in the background. The honest catch is recovery: a mainstream provider can email you a password reset because it holds your key, while a zero-knowledge provider cannot, by design. That puts the responsibility for your recovery code on you. The fix is mundane, a password manager and a saved recovery key, and it is a small habit in exchange for storage that genuinely cannot be read by anyone but you.
Pick a service and install its sync client, then copy your files into the new folder rather than moving everything at once. Verify a few files open, save the recovery code somewhere safe, then point your devices at the new storage and let the rest catch up over a day or two. If you are leaving a specific service, our Google Drive alternatives and Dropbox alternatives pages walk through each move. If you cannot migrate yet, a secure file encryption tool like Cryptomator encrypts files locally before they sync, so you keep familiar storage while taking the keys back. To cut a whole ecosystem out, the de-Google playbook covers the rest.